Differences and Similarities between Christianity and Islam Essay

Differences and Similarities between Christianity and Islam - Essay Example As the son of God, Jesus is an integral part of God. Christianity is based on the idea that God has revealed Himself through Jesus Christ. Every Christian should live in accordance with the ten Christian commandments that forbid people to kill, lie, steal, etc. These laws are designed to help a person to live a life that is pleasing to God. In this respect, faith in Jesus Christ as their personal savior is a central element of Christianity. The theme of salvation presented in Christianity is inextricably linked with the idea of Jesus Christ and his role in the whole of humanity. According to the Christian view, Christ is the Messiah who came to save the world. Faith in Jesus Christ and His atoning sacrifice is the central element of Christianity. A Christian is a person who believes in the death and resurrection of Christ who came into this world to save all humankind from sinfulness. In other words, Christianity is not conceivable without faith in Jesus Christ and His extremely impo rtant role for all of humanity. Faith in Jesus Christ as the Son of God is the opportunity for eternal life after death. Through the figure of Jesus, the concept of death receives the original interpretation.Christianity does not accept death as an end, rather, death is seen as the beginning of a new life, while life on earth serves as a preparation for it (Houben, n.d.). The first humans (Adam and Eve) were created by God for eternity but they ate the forbidden fruit and became mortal. Man has lost the right to live an eternal life on earth.

Coyne and Messina Articles Analysis Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Coyne and Messina Articles Analysis - Term Paper Example The studies conducted by Coyne’s and Messina’s groups are similar, since they are fundamentally interested in bettering the status and quality of the healthcare industry and the services it accords. To this effect, both groups choose dependent and independent variables and then research and analyze how these variables can be harnessed in order to improve the status of the American healthcare industry and services. Specifically, on one hand, Coyne and his group consider the relevance of causative variables like the type of hospital ownership and hospital size in furthering the cause of efficiency within the framework of healthcare services provision. On the other hand, Messina and his group research and scrutinize the nexus between patient satisfaction in teaching and nonteaching healthcare organizations, which practice inpatient admission. There is no gainsaying that patient satisfaction and efficiency are principle yardsticks of determining industrial success. Both Coyne and Messina carry out an extensive reviewing of already existing literature materials, in order to explain and analyze the relationship between the (independent and dependent) variables and the research findings. The same literature materials authenticate and generate recommendations that will be later on proposed. Coyne et al. (2009) and Messina et al. (2009) incorporate identical design elements in their research activities. Apart from the fact that both works are quantitative, the same also use sampling, as a way of narrowing the demographic components that are to be analyzed. For example, Coyne and the group discard private-owned hospitals and hospitals outside the state of Washington. For Messina and his group, seven teaching and nonteaching hospitals that were renowned between 1999 and 2003 suffice. However, even as a myriad of similarities between Coyne and Messina’s works abounds, differences between the two research works also exist. At one end, Messina and his proteges are intent on confirming and divulging on the relationship between inpatient admission in teaching and nonteaching hospitals, and patient satisfaction. At the other end, Coyne and his group are interested in shedding light on how the type of hospital ownership and hospital size relate with cost and efficiency. Two fundamental problems guide the work that Messina and his group carry out. These problems are the relationships that exist between patient satisfaction and inpatient admission in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. This is unlike the work that Joseph Coyne and his groups carry out. Particularly, Joseph Coyne and his group’s research undertaking investigates a single research question- the relationship between cost and efficiency and hospital size and the type of hospital ownership. In respect to the foregoing, there is lucidity in saying that while Coyne and his proteges’ research study is a two-way study of variance that of Messina and his prote ges is a multivariate design. The variables in the two analyses are also different. The independent variables for Coyne and his group include the structure of hospital ownership and hospital size, while teaching and nonteaching healthcare institutions serve as independent variables for Messina’s group. For dependent variables, Coyne and his gr